Not for every project. There are three general conclusions of a remediation review:
1. The remediation professional did not identify any deficiencies. When there are no deficiencies, there is no need to produce technical documents.
2. Deficiencies were identified, but they can be corrected without new technical documents. In this situation, the deficiencies can be corrected through a detailed written description provided by the remediation professional in a remediation letter.
• If building plans already exist, the remediation professional may be able to make corrections through annotations, clouding, and deltas.
• If existing documents are revised, the revisions must be attributed to the individual responsible for the revisions.
3. Deficiencies were identified that will require design corrections detailed in technical documents. In this case, technical documents will be produced by the remediation professional in addition to the remediation letter.