The Nebraska Professional

blog title

Fraudulent Seal Use on the Rise

The Board is warning Nebraska-licensed architects and professional engineers, as well as project owners, building officials, contractors, and the public, about a growing trend involving unauthorized and fraudulent use of architect and professional engineer seals—particularly through freelance online marketplaces.

The Board has recently identified an increase in cases involving:

  • Online marketplaces that appear to use Nebraska licensees’ architect or professional engineer seals without their knowledge or consent, and

  • Unlicensed individuals appearing to produce technical documents with fake or fraudulent architect or professional engineer seals.

In some cases, project owners who believe they are complying with Nebraska law through services provided through these marketplaces unknowingly obtain drawings or other technical documents from them that include fraudulent seals. 

The use of architect and professional engineer seals by unauthorized persons are deceptive and unlawful; may pose a significant risk to life, health, and property; and undermine public welfare.

Why This Is a Serious Violation

The Nebraska Engineers and Architects Regulation Act prohibits:

  • The practice of architecture or engineering without a license,

  • Using or attempting to use the certificate of licensure or the seal of another person, and

  • Falsely impersonating a licensed professional.

How to Identify Potential Fraud

Often, seals may appear legitimate at first glance but lack required elements such as a valid license number, engineering discipline, or a real, verifiable licensee.

The Board urges project owners and building officials to be vigilant when they encounter:

  • Unusually low-cost design services offered through freelance or online marketplaces;

  • Avoidance when attempting to set up a face-to-face meeting to talk about a potential project;

  • Seals that appear altered, incomplete, or inconsistent;

  • Missing or unverifiable license information; and

  • Little or no direct communication with the licensee whose seal is to be placed on the work. 

To help prevent misuse of their professional seal, licensees should:

  • Maintain secure control of their physical and/or electronic seal;

  • Never unduly share their seal or signature with other parties;

  • Only seal work prepared by them or under their direct supervision;

  • Monitor projects in which their seal has been used, and

  • Report suspected misuse to the Board immediately.

Reporting Suspected Violations

The Board relies on the public and industry professionals to help identify and address violations. Anyone who suspects suspicious use of a licensee’s seal is encouraged to file a complaint if they encounter activity that is believed to be a violation of the Nebraska Engineers and Architects Regulation Act. 

In addition, the Board urges project owners and licensees to contact the Nebraska Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division at 402-471-2683 if they suspect or encounter fraudulent use of the seal of a Nebraska-licensed architect or professional engineer.

                          The Practice of Registered Interior Design and Its                            Overlap with The Practice of Architecture

The Nebraska Interior Design Voluntary Registration Act (the “ID Act”, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§71-6101 to 71-6108) was passed by the Nebraska Legislature and signed into law on March 5, 2024. 

The ID Act creates a voluntary registry for interior designers to be administered by the State Treasurer and for qualified interior designers to use the title “Registered Interior Designer.” The ID Act also gives registered interior designers the ability to perform work that is, in the Board’s opinion, part of the practice of architecture as defined in the Nebraska Engineers and Architects Regulation Act (the “E&A Act”).

The E&A Act defines the practice of architecture in Neb. Rev. Stat. §81-3420: 

Practice of architecture means providing or offering to provide design services in connection with the construction, enlargement, or alteration of a building or group of buildings and the space within and surrounding the buildings. The services may include, but not be limited to, planning, providing studies, designs, drawings, specifications, and other technical submissions, and administering construction contracts. The practice of architecture does not include the practice of engineering.

Similarly, the ID Act defines the practice of registered interior design in N.R.S. §71-6103 (6)(a):

Practice of registered interior design means the design of interior spaces as part of an interior alteration or construction project in conformity with public health, safety, and welfare requirements, including the preparation of any document relating to a building code description, any project egress plan that does not require additional exits in the space affected, any space planning, any finish material, any furnishing, any fixture, any equipment, and the preparation of any document and technical submission relating to interior construction.

N.R.S. §71-6103 (6)(b) lists services that are not in the scope of the practice of registered interior design:

Services that are not in the scope of the practice of registered interior design include:

(i) Services that constitute: (A) The practice of professional engineering; or (B) The practice of professional architecture, except as specifically provided for within the Engineers and Architects Regulation Act;

(ii) The construction or alteration of: (A) The structural system of a building, including changing the building's live or dead load on the structural system; (B) The building envelope, including an exterior wall, wall covering, or wall opening, an exterior window, an exterior door, any architectural trim, a balcony or similar projection, a bay, an oriel window, any roof assembly and rooftop structure, and any glass and glazing for exterior use in both vertical and sloped applications; (C) Any mechanical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, ventilation, electrical, vertical transportation, fire sprinkler, or fire alarm system; (D) An egress system beyond the exit access component of such system; and (E) Any life safety system such as a fire safety or fire protection of structural elements and smoke evacuation and compartmentalization system or a fire-rated vertical shaft in multistory structures;

(iii) Changes to an occupancy classification of greater hazard as determined by the International Building Code; and

(iv) Changes to the construction classification of the building or structure according to the International Building Code;

Additionally, both the E&A Act and Board rules allow for unlicensed persons to practice architecture as described in Rule 10.3 (the “Exemption Matrix” or “matrix”):

Notwithstanding other provisions of the E&A Act, persons who are not licensed architects or professional engineers may perform planning and design services in connection with any building, structure, or work as indicated below:

table

Analysis of Practice Overlaps

It is the Board’s position that the practice of registered interior design is entirely a subset of the practice of architecture. The ID Act makes reference to the practice of architecture in 71-6103(6)(b)(i)(B), so the ID Act itself supports the Board’s position. It is also the Board’s position that anyone practicing within the scope of registered interior design is also practicing within the scope of architecture.

To determine what work registered interior designers may perform and on what types (by occupancy classification) of projects they may perform that work, the Board offers the following guidance.

First, on any project exempt from the E&A Act---adversely impacting an area less than the maximum building area listed in Rule 10.3—both registered interior designers and non-registered interior designers may perform all planning and design services done in connection with the project, including any and all work that could be construed as the practices of architecture, engineering, registered interior design.  However, registered interior designers may not perform any of the services that are ‘not in the scope of interior design’ on projects of any size. 

Next, on projects subject to E&A Act—adversely impacting an area greater than the maximum building area listed in Rule 10.3— registered interior designers are allowed to perform services described as the practice of registered interior design done in connection with the project.

For example, work related to a project adversely impacting 4,000 square feet of a structure classified as a Business (B) occupancy and consisting only of space planning and selection and specifications of finish materials and fixtures services could be performed by a registered interior designer. An architect would not need to be involved in the project.

Finally, on projects subject to E&A Act:

  • Non-registered interior designers may not provide services that constitute the practice of registered interior design, architecture, or engineering, and

  • Registered interior designers may not provide services that are explicitly listed as not constituting the practice of registered interior design.

The Board’s analysis of practice overlaps is summarized in the following two tables.

Table 1

1) May non-registered interior designers perform work

 

3a) … on a project of a size smaller than Exemption Matrix limits?

3b) … on a project of a size larger than Exemption Matrix limits?

2a) … within the scope of registered interior design …

ALLOWED

NOT ALLOWED

2b) … outside the scope of registered interior design …

ALLOWED

NOT ALLOWED

Table 2

1) May registered interior designers perform work …

 

3a) … on a project of a size smaller than Exemption Matrix limits?

3b) … on a project of a size larger than Exemption Matrix limits?

2a) … within the scope of registered interior design …

ALLOWED

ALLOWED

2b) … outside the scope of registered interior design …

ALLOWED

NOT ALLOWED

2c) … specifically listed as not in the scope of registered interior design … 

NOT ALLOWED

NOT ALLOWED

Coordinating Professionals

N.R.S. §81-3437.02 requires that projects involving more than one architect or professional engineer shall have one architect or professional engineer designated as the coordinating professional for the entire project.  In addition, the Nebraska Professional Landscape Architects Act mandates that landscape architecture design projects involving more than one professional landscape architect, architect, or professional engineer shall have a designated coordinating professional for the entire project, and this is reflected in Board Rule 6.3.1.

There are no provisions in the ID Act allowing registered interior designers to act as a coordinating professional on any project. Consequently, it is the Board’s position that registered interior designers cannot act as the coordinating professional on any project subject to the E&A Act.

Information in this article comes from a guidance document published by the Board. Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §84-901.03, this guidance document is advisory in nature but is binding on the Nebraska Board of Engineers and Architects until amended by the board. A guidance document does not include internal procedural documents that only affect the internal operations of the agency and does not impose additional requirements or penalties on regulated parties or include confidential information or rules and regulations made in accordance with the Nebraska Administrative Procedure Act. If you believe that this guidance document imposes additional requirements or penalties on regulated parties, you may request a review of the document.

                                       Next NBEA Webinar: When Does a Lumber                                         Estimate Become a Design? Know the Line.

Join us for a free webinar on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. CST and gain essential insight into the Nebraska Engineers and Architects Regulation Act (E&A Act)—and how it applies to the work you do.

What may seem like a straightforward material takeoff or building layout can, in some cases, cross into the practice of architecture or engineering. Understanding where that line is can help you avoid risk, support your customers, and keep projects moving smoothly.

This session will break down what you need to know in a clear, real-world way.

In this webinar, you will:

  • Understand when an estimate or layout may be considered “design” under the Act 

  • Learn when a Nebraska-licensed architect or engineer must be involved 

  • Gain practical examples you can apply immediately 

  • Have the opportunity to ask questions and get straightforward answers

The E&A Act exists to ensure that buildings are designed by qualified professionals when required—protecting life, health, property, and public welfare. Having a clear understanding of these requirements helps you better serve your customers while reducing potential liability.

Don’t miss this opportunity—reserve your spot today. Strengthen your understanding of the Act, support safe construction practices, and help prevent the unlicensed practice of architecture or engineering—whether by preparing plans without proper Nebraska licensure or by failing to engage a licensed design professional when required.

webinar

NCEES News

NCEES Seeks Licensed Engineers and Engineering Faculty for FE Exam Survey

NCEES is seeking licensed engineers and engineering faculty to participate in an online survey for the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam. The results of this online survey will be used to update the content of the FE exam, a process that occurs every six to eight years.

To access the online survey, please click here. The survey will remain open until April 27, 2026.

Data Shows Practice Exams Increase FE Exam Pass Rates

In 2025, NCEES fully transitioned its engineering exams to computer-based testing and introduced interactive practice exams to match the new format. These tools offer timed testing, instant feedback, and performance insights to help candidates better prepare.

Since their release, candidates have used these resources—and those who did saw higher pass rates across all FE disciplines, especially repeat test takers.

NCEES research showed that those who took an interactive practice exam had measurably higher exam pass rates than those who did not—in every FE discipline. The benefit was most evident among repeat examinees, with some FE exam pass rates more than 10 percentage points higher for those who purchased interactive practice exams.

Access more information about the NCEES FE Exams.

Entries Open for the 2026 NCEES Engineering Education Awards

The 2026 NCEES Engineering Education Award competition is open for entries. All projects must be received by May 1, 2026.

The competition recognizes programs that have a broad and robust curriculum and best reflect NCEES’ mission to advance licensure in both fields in order to safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Additionally, the awards are intended to encourage programs to engage their students with other professionals, introduce them to new technology, and promote licensure.

The University of Nebraska—Lincoln’s Charles W. Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction won the 2025 NCEES Engineering Education Award grand prize. The department received the $25,000 award for its submission, Carson Headquarters.

Visit NCEES to learn more about the NCEES Engineering & Surveying Education Awards.

NCARB News

NCARB Announces Updates to Online Proctoring Requirements

Starting June 1, 2026, NCARB will implement two changes to ARE® online proctoring requirements. 

First, all candidates will be required to use a mobile device as a secondary camera. The mobile device camera must capture the entire computer screen, the full keyboard and mouse or trackpad, both hands while typing, and the side of the candidate’s face. 

Second, delivery of the ARE® through online proctoring will only be supported on computers running a Windows Operating System. Mac and Linux devices will no longer be accepted.

A new version of the ARE Guidelines reflecting both changes will become available in mid-May. Any candidate with a scheduled online proctored appointment on or after June 1 who will not be able to comply with the requirements may reschedule their appointment at no additional cost. Candidates who need help rescheduling an appointment should contact NCARB.

Visit NCARB for more information on the updated online proctoring requirements

New Reciprocity Agreement Between United States and South Africa

On April 17, 2026, NCARB and the South African Council for the Architectural Profession (SACAP) signed a new Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA). Effective July 6, 2026, the new MRA will expand access to opportunities for international architects. 

This agreement will enable eligible architects to benefit from a more straightforward process to get licensed/registered, helping them to establish professional contacts and perform services as a registered architect in each country. The agreement also represents a significant step in NCARB’s commitment to expanding opportunities for NCARB-certified architects while maintaining rigorous standards to protect the public. 

For more information on this new MRA, please visit the NCARB website.

How NCARB Updates Its Programs

Have you ever wondered what drives updates to NCARB’s programs, like the changes to the Architectural Experience Program® (AXP®) reporting policy in November 2025 or the removal of the three-year waiting period from the Education Alternative to NCARB Certification in January 2026? In the latest NCARB video in the How it Works series, How NCARB Updates its Programs, explores the full process of NCARB program updates—from where ideas are sourced, to how our volunteer committees become involved, to implementation.

This is the second video in NCARB’s How it Works video series, which demystifies NCARB's processes, including the exam, the experience program, and more. Watch the first video on how Architect Registration Examination® (ARE®) items are developed.

Licensure Updates

 

Licensees

 

Recently Resolved Compliance Cases

Case 24.50 – Unlicensed Practice of Architecture and Engineering- 81-3442(1)(a)

Summary: The Board was notified of the submission of unsealed plans to another state agency for the renovation of a two-story building classified as a Business (B) occupancy. The total renovation was approximately 4,662 square feet. The exemption level for Business (B) occupancies is less than 3,000 square feet, as noted in Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Rule 10.3.2

Because this project exceeds 3,000 square feet, it is subject to the Act.

The plans did not bear the seal of a Nebraska-licensed architect or professional engineer. 

Action: The Board authorized architecture and engineering remediation to bring the project into compliance with the Act.

Per Board Rule 8.4, the project owner engaged a Nebraska-licensed architect to evaluate the project for compliance with the Act. 

During the project evaluation, the remediation professional determined that the project scope did not involve work constituting the practice of engineering, aside from mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems. Those systems were designed and constructed by licensed tradespeople (Neb. Rev. Stat. §81-3453(8)). Based on the defined scope of work, the remediation professional did not identify a need to involve a professional engineer. 

The remediation professional identified deficiencies and recommended design solutions. The project owner corrected the identified deficiencies based on the recommendations from the remediation professional. As a result, the Board dismissed the complaint without disciplinary action based on the successful completion of architecture and engineering remediation.

Case 25.16 and 25.21 - Unlicensed Individual Practice - 81-3442(1)(a)

Summary: The Board was notified of the submission of unsealed plans to another state agency for the renovation of a single-story building [Business (B) occupancy] comprising approximately 3,500 square feet. The exemption level for Business (B) occupancies is less than 3,000 square feet, as noted in Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Rule 10.3.2

Because this project exceeds 3,000 square feet, it is subject to the Act.

The plans did not bear the seal of a Nebraska-licensed architect or professional engineer. 

Action: The Board received additional information indicating that a Nebraska-licensed professional engineer was involved in the project; however, as no Nebraska-licensed architect was involved, the Board authorized architecture remediation to bring the project into compliance with the Act.

Per Board Rule 8.4, the project owner engaged a Nebraska-licensed architect to evaluate the project for compliance with the Act. During this review, the remediation professional identified deficiencies and recommended design solutions. The project owner corrected the identified deficiencies based on the recommendations from the remediation professional. As a result, the Board dismissed the complaint without disciplinary action based on the successful completion of architecture remediation.

Case 26.01 – Unlicensed Individual Practice - 81-3442(1)(a)

Summary: The Board was notified of the submission of unsealed plans to another state agency for the construction of a single-story building [mixed Business (B) and Factory (F) occupancy] comprising approximately 16,500 square feet. 

Any structure that contains two or more occupancies is governed by the most restrictive occupancy for purposes of determining whether the project is exempt (Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Chapter 10.3.11). The exemption level for Business (B) occupancies is 3,000 or more square feet (Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Chapter 10.3.2). The exemption level for Factory (F) occupancies is 5,000 or more square feet (Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Chapter 10.3.4). In this case, the most restrictive occupancy is Business (B), and therefore, the entire project is considered a Business (B) occupancy. 

Because this project exceeds 3,000 square feet, it is subject to the Act.

The plans did not bear the seal of a Nebraska-licensed architect or professional engineer. 

Action: Through its investigation, the Board received information confirming that a Nebraska-licensed professional engineer was involved in the project; however, as no Nebraska-licensed architect was involved, the Board authorized architecture remediation to bring the project into compliance with the Act.

Per Board Rule 8.4, the project owner engaged a Nebraska-licensed architect as a remediation professional to review the project for compliance with the Act. As a result, the Board dismissed the complaint without disciplinary action due to the engagement of a licensed architect and dismissed the matter without prejudice.

Case 26.02 – Unlicensed Practice of Architecture- 81-3442(1)(a)

Summary: The Board was notified of the submission of unsealed plans to another state agency for the construction of a single-story [Storage (S) occupancy] comprising approximately 36,000 square feet. The exemption level for Storage (S) occupancies is less than 5,000 square feet, as noted in Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Rule 10.3.9

Because this project exceeds 5,000 square feet, it is subject to the Act.

The plans bore the seal of a Nebraska-licensed professional engineer on the architectural designs. This Nebraska-licensed professional engineer is not licensed to practice architecture in Nebraska.

Action: The Board authorized architecture remediation to bring the project into compliance with the Act.

Per Board Rule 8.4, the project owner engaged a Nebraska-licensed architect as a remediation professional to review the project for compliance with the Act. As a result, the Board dismissed the complaint without disciplinary action due to the engagement of a licensed architect and dismissed the matter without prejudice.

Case 26.03 – Unlicensed Practice of Architecture- 81-3442(1)(a) 

Summary: The Board was notified of the submission of unsealed plans to another state agency for the construction of a single-story [Storage (S) occupancy] comprising approximately 36,400 square feet. The exemption level for Storage (S) occupancies is less than 5,000 square feet, as noted in Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Rule 10.3.9

Because this project exceeds 5,000 square feet, it is subject to the Act.

The plans bore the seal of a Nebraska-licensed professional engineer on the architectural designs. This Nebraska-licensed professional engineer is not licensed to practice architecture in Nebraska.

Action: The Board authorized architecture remediation to bring the project into compliance with the Act.

Per Board Rule 8.4, the project owner engaged a Nebraska-licensed architect as a remediation professional to review the project for compliance with the Act. As a result, the Board dismissed the complaint without disciplinary action due to the engagement of a licensed architect and dismissed the matter without prejudice.

Case 26.04 – Unlicensed Individual Practice - 81-3442(1)(a)

Summary: A complaint was submitted alleging that the Respondent was engaging in the unlicensed practice of architecture and engineering in a building project consisting of a 10,000-square-foot addition to an existing 7,200-square-foot building classified as a Storage (S) occupancy under the state building code. The exemption level for Storage (S) occupancies is less than 5,000 square feet, as noted in Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Rule 10.3.9

Because this project exceeds 5,000 square feet, it is subject to the Act.

The Respondent performed design services by preparing technical documents that constitute the practice of architecture and engineering; however, the Respondent does not hold a license to practice architecture or engineering in Nebraska, nor does it appear to employ licensed architects or professional engineers.

Action: After reviewing the complaint, the Board found that no formal administrative or disciplinary action was warranted but chose to issue a Letter of Caution and to inform the Respondent to use greater care to avoid any repetition of such activities.

Case 26.05 – Unlicensed Practice - 81-3442(1)(a)

Summary: A complaint was submitted alleging that the Respondent was engaging in the unlicensed practice of architecture and engineering in a building project consisting of the construction of a single-story [mixed Business (B) and Factory (F) occupancy] comprising approximately 16,500 square feet. 

Any structure that contains two or more occupancies is governed by the most restrictive occupancy for purposes of determining whether the project is exempt (Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Chapter 10.3.11). The exemption level for Business (B) occupancies is 3,000 or more square feet (Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Chapter 10.3.2). The exemption level for Factory (F) occupancies is 5,000 or more square feet (Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Chapter 10.3.4). In this case, the most restrictive occupancy is Business, and therefore, the entire project is considered a Business (B) occupancy. 

Because this project exceeds 3,000 square feet, it is subject to the Act.

The Respondent had performed design services by preparing technical documents that constitute the practice of architecture and engineering; however, the Respondent does not hold a license to practice architecture or engineering in Nebraska.

Action: After reviewing the complaint, the Board found that no formal administrative or disciplinary action was warranted but chose to issue a Letter of Caution and to inform the Respondent to use greater care to avoid any repetition of such activities.

Case 26.08 – Unlicensed Individual Practice - 81-3442(1)(a)

Summary: A complaint was submitted alleging that the Respondent was engaging in the unlicensed practice of architecture in commercial renovation by sealing architectural sheets of the plans. The Respondent is a Nebraska-licensed professional engineer but is not a Nebraska-licensed architect. 

The building project consisted of the renovation of a building classified as a Business (B) occupancy under the state building code, comprising approximately 5,000 square feet. The exemption level for Business (B) occupancies is less than 3,000 square feet, as noted in Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Rule 10.3.2

Because this project exceeds 3,000 square feet, it is subject to the Act.

Action: After reviewing the complaint, the Board found that no formal administrative or disciplinary action was warranted but chose to issue a Letter of Caution and to inform the Respondent to use greater care to avoid any repetition of such activities.

Case 26.10 – Unlicensed Individual Practice - 81-3442(1)(a)

Summary: A complaint was submitted alleging that the Respondent was engaging in the unlicensed practice of architecture and engineering by preparing building plans for a building project consisting of the addition of a single-story building [Assembly (A) occupancy] comprising approximately 2,208 square feet. The exemption level for Assembly (A) occupancies is less than 1,000 square feet, as noted in Neb. Admin. Code, Title 110, Rule 10.3.1

Because this project exceeds 1,000 square feet, it is subject to the Act.

The plans did not bear the seal of a Nebraska-licensed architect or professional engineer.

Action: After reviewing the complaint, the Board found that no formal administrative or disciplinary action was warranted but chose to issue a Letter of Caution and to inform the Respondent to use greater care to avoid any repetition of such activities.

* * *

For further information regarding the enforcement process, please click here.

For a full list of formal disciplinary actions taken by the Board, please click here.


The Nebraska Professional Archive 

The Nebraska Professional #63

The Nebraska Professional #62

Please click here for past issues


If you have questions about topics in this digital newsletter, previous issues, or other topics that would be helpful to publish in our next release, please contact us.